Username:   Password:     Forgot Password? | Register     


Rate this Entry

5 ways to save Pakistan cricket

dark_Shadow_ February 2, 2010
Updated February 2, 2010 at 02:21 PM by The Bunyip

OK, so anyone with a brain and an iota of cricketing knowledge knows that Pakistan’s recent Antipodean forays have been a debacle. Only some inspired bowling in the second test and Kiwi summer rain in the third saved them from dropping a series there, and since there is no such thing as summer rain in Australia (this New Years Day in Sydney excepted) nothing could save them as they blew a near-certain test victory at the SCG before going to sleep for the rest of the series until a minor fightback during the last ODI. Add to that the captaincy issues, Younis Khan being AWOL for the tests, the consistent and persistent fielding problems, the recent Shahid Afridi ball-tampering scandal...I think it’s safe to say that calling this Pakistani team a rabble is an insult to rabbles.

Except for Salman Butt in patches and Shahid Afridi doing his thing in the ODIs, none of the other batsmen played with any testicular fortitude. Mohammed Asif and young Mohammad Aamer both bowled with zip (one would have to say they would be the two players to leave Australia with enhanced reputations) but they were rarely backed up by their fellow bowlers. The tail crumbled regularly with the bat and ruined Pakistan’s legacy of lower order fightbacks. And the less said about Mohammad Yousuf’s captaincy tactics the better.

Now, I’ll admit to being an Aussie. That too, an Aussie of Indian descent. But I’m old enough to remember when Pakistan were opponents to be feared and respected, in the days of the two Ws and the “mota aloo” Inzy. And all loyalties said and done, world cricket is better for having a strong, competitive Pakistani team.

So what needs to be done?

Get a new captain and stick with him.
And I don’t mean Younis or Afridi. Sure, Mohammad Yousuf has shown us all that he’s a lousy captain, and his batting has also taken a dive. But Younis Khan clearly doesn’t have the full respect of his team and re-appointing him will just lead to a repeat of what happened before. And if you seriously think of Afridi as a Test player, let alone captain...drop the crack pipe now and slap yourself upside your head. His recent ball-tampering incident shows that he clearly doesn’t have the smarts you need as a captain of any format, let alone a five day grind.

No, Pakistan need to have the balls to appoint a young captain who will be in the side for a long time, and more importantly need to stand by him even if he fails.

Salman Butt would be a good choice for mine. He’s only 25 and has shown that even if his technique isn’t rock solid, he can make the most of it and score runs, even if his running between the wickets needs work. Plus, he seems like a reasonably cool head, something you need from a captain. Make Mohammad Aamer his deputy in a few years once he gets some more experience.

New Zealand took a similar approach with Stephen Fleming. South Africa also did with Graeme Smith. I would argue that along with Steve Waugh, they are the leading captains of the past 15 years. Pakistan are at a point now where they need to do the same.

Improve the fielding.
Yes, I’ve heard all about how fielding is a grassroots problem in Pakistan, how no one wants to work on it, how a fielding coach is unnecessary etc etc etc...bollocks.

These may be true, but there’s a simple fact being ignored here. As my old coach used to say, “there are three aspects of fielding. A little practice, a little hard work, and a lot of practice.”

Anyone can become a good fielder if they train hard enough. That’s why if I were Ijaz Butt, I’d be on the phone to Jonty Rhodes (or any other fielding expert) and offering them the deed to my soul to come and whip the team into shape. Make them catch till their hands bleed and chase balls till they can’t run any more. There’s a lot of work to do, but it can be done.

Focus less on 20/20 and more on Test cricket.
Again with the excuses of how 20/20 suits the Pakistani game more, how the kids don’t want to play Tests when they can blast the ball around like they see in 20/20, this, that, whatever. All well and good, but ultimately it doesn’t matter how good a 20/20 side you are, if you can’t play well in Tests no one takes you seriously.

Therefore, to succeed in the long term Pakistan has got to start finding young players who have a sound technique above all and working on them from there. It is easier to teach a batsman to play strokes if he has a strong defence and solid technique (see Rahul Dravid) than it is to teach a slogger how to play sensibly (Shahid Afridi again). (BTW, I have no vendetta against Afridi, I just consider him overrated in all non-20/20 formats).

The most successful Test nations of recent times (Australia and South Africa in particular) have treated 20/20 as what it is - a bit of fun and a way to make easy money, but not a lot else. India are now beginning to realise that and are focusing on getting some extra tests in their schedule. Pakistan need to do the same. Whinging that your players can’t go make an arseload of cash in a hit-and-run tournament designed purely to make Lalit Modi richer isn’t helping in any way.

Sack Kamran Akmal...
...until the dude learns to keep wickets. Or pick him purely as a batsman if his batting is that valuable. But don’t get further sucked into the modern trap that it’s better to have a mediocre keeper who can make more runs than a good keeper who may not be hot stuff with the bat. Sarfaraz Ahmed is the future when it comes to Pakistani keeping and he deserves an extended run. Plus, he showed in Hobart that he’s a reasonably solid batsman - a quality lacking in Pakistan right now.

Show some heart.
In all honesty, the Pakistanis would probably not have won either the Test or ODI series in Australia. While their pace bowling attack is world class, little else about their team (top order, keeping, fielding or spin options) are genuinely so and in three of the four categories (arguably all four with the development of Hauritz) Australia have them beaten, but not by so much that a determined, aggressive Pakistani team would be out of the game.

If the Pakistani team had at least played the series with some heart, they would have been much more competitive. You can say what you like about Yousuf’s tactics to Hussey and Siddle at the SCG, but there isn’t any reason to not chase down 176, even if there is a little bite still in the pitch. And they seemed to be asleep for the first four one-dayers.

Feel free to criticise me as you will, although since I’m ethnically the same as most Pakistani supporters, racism probably isn’t the smartest accusation to throw around.
Posted in Cricket
Views 2212 Comments 43 Email Blog Entry

Total Comments 43

Comments

    problems with Pakistan cricket and thier answers

    Being a Pakistani, I can relate to all this.

    Problem No.1: Why Pakistan has been unable to produce quality test batsmen for such a long time when they possess a battery of top class fast and spin bowlers??

    Answer: Quality test batting requires such ingredients which are extremely deficient in typical Pakistani culture and mentality. Patience, Composure, Calmness, Steady head, Cool (not over reacting to pressure) are the traits you associate with top quality batsmen who can stay at the wicket and produce runs, but these things dont exist in the dictionary of an average Pakistani youth. They are bred and trained in society in a way where they are encouraged to be aggressive, pressurizing others for self interests etc. Furthermore, being a third world country doesnt help either. The more frustrated you are as a human being, the more impatient you become and I assure you there are plenty of frustrated youth in Pakistan. May be if Pakistani youth is given free access to women, we might be able to produce good quality batsmen.

    Problem No. 2: Who to make the captain now after the humiliation downunder?

    Answer: Afridi for 20/20s and ODIs. So what if he got picked while tempering the ball. Same happened with Michael Atherton, was he removed from captaincy?. For christ sake, Mike Gatting did the worse crime of all (fought with the Umpire on the field in Faisalabad in 1987) but kept the captaincy. All these incidents are generally acceptable professional hazards now which have become a regular feature in the cricketing pages every now and then so if Afridi pretended that he was eating an apple with the ball, I really dont think its that big a deal in the overall context of things. Give him the ICC ban and let him in. He is a valuable asset of the country (not to mention a leader too) and should be in the side.

    For test matches, Pakistan's captaincy I think is one of the most difficult online riddles right now. One thing is for sure, it cannot be given to a batsman. There is no rocket science to understand it. For simple reason that batsmen in Pakistan team are so inconsistent and get dropped so frequently that complete Pakistan batting order changes on semi annual basis except one or two faces (who we already know are not good captains). You cant make a player captain if he cant retain his place in the team. So i guess the captain should be a bowler or an all-rounder. But who??? M. Asif cant be captain after his drug scandal. M. Amir is just too young. Umar Gul, i dont think will be able to keep the team together. Rana Naveed, not in the test side all the time. Perhaps, its time to take the most drastic decision of all. Get Shoiab Akhtar back in the team and make him the captain.....That decision would take balls of thunder and probably Ijaz Butt will be out of his job on the very first defeat that Pakistan faces after Shoiab's appointment, but what if they dont get defeated and win something?? I dont know....this question is tough.

    Problem No. 3: Why Pakistani fielding is so consistently poor? Why are they bend on setting new standards of poor fielding in history of modern cricket??

    Answer: Because in Pakistani culture (I mean grass root, something you are tought since childhood), doing too much of physical exertion is something that is supposed to be done by sub-ordinates. As a leader, you are only expected to supervise with no hard work. Same culture flows through the players and when they get in the cricket field as a senior pro, they have this mindset that it is not expected of them to field with heart. They might take catches if they come thier way but they will not be very optimistic about it. This 'Khalifa' (King) culture exists not only in Pakistan but also in India (explains India's poor fielding as well to some extent). Until this mentality of " I am the senior guy, why should i dive or run" remains in the thinking zone of Pakistani cricketers, fielding will never improve no matter Jonty Rhodes becomes the fielding coach of Pakistan for rest of his life. Fielding will improve when the fielders will desire to field, not just by catching practice and fielding drills.
    permalink
    hasan matloob February 3, 2010
    the problem is just there batting because they have always had a good bowler. Look at waqar and wasim and aamir. Now look at the batting. if it worked it worked if it didnt it didnt
    permalink
    themens_123 February 3, 2010
    goood blog but as i know in indai and pakistan both tape balls but in pak they use tennis ball as tape ball which is very light weighted but in india they use very heavy ball which is so much defferent
    but the problem is not ball i think.whts going in pak and players have alot of non unity in btwn
    but as am fan of pak lover of cricket and as pakistani
    i hope every thing gonna fine we we becaome united.no racism
    our ppl think like captain should be pathan or panjabi they dont think they are only pakistani
    they think they r best but they dont think they are the ambessadors
    as i think javed miandad was good coach .afridi is nice to make them united but malik is also excellent captain but with him problm again he is nice person
    and in this world there is no place for nice ppl
    permalink
    ar0505465579 February 4, 2010
    Shaob Akhtar for captin? I thought he was also involved in that same drug scandal. Among several other non-drug related cricketing controversies. While i agree, none of their current batsmen suit the captiancy role. I feel that Pakistan haven't had a patient batsmen who could also captain a side since Inzamam. Don't get me wrong, i love Akhtar as much as the next guy, but i feel he would just clash too much with the other members.

    What ever happened to Abdul Razzaq?
    permalink
    Myaru February 4, 2010
    Shaob Akhtar for captin? I thought he was also involved in that same drug scandal. Among several other non-drug related cricketing controversies. While i agree, none of their current batsmen suit the captiancy role. I feel that Pakistan haven't had a patient batsmen who could also captain a side since Inzamam. Don't get me wrong, i love Akhtar as much as the next guy, but i feel he would just clash too much with the other members.

    What ever happened to Abdul Razzaq?


    Truly agree with you. Abdur Razzaq would be a good idea

    Pakistan's cricket problem is restricted to ODI's & tests. They are the best T20 side in the world so there dark shadow is right. Don't pay too much attention to T20. Obviously it doesn't mean that they completely leave working for the T20 but they obviously have to give more importance to test and odi cricket. And how can that be done?

    MORE YOUNG PLAYERS

    If you remember, Fawad Alam and Umar Akmal were the most consistent players in the side against Ausrtralia. Khalid Latif played only one match but if you remember he made a half-century in the sereies against New Zealand. Pakistan has a got a lot of talent in their U-19 and U-21 teams and they should be harnessed

    RAZZAQ AS CAPTAIN

    Abdur Razzaq is a very talented player. He is a great all-rounder. Not only his batting but his bowling is great. He has to be made brought back into the side and made test and odi captain. Afridi can continue with T20s
    permalink
    Ahson Afzal February 4, 2010
    but still indian cries and get jealous of pakistan cuz they r 20 20 world champions but time will cum that pakistan will mkae iin one dayers and test and its not far wait india and world
    permalink
    kewel240 February 4, 2010
    I agree with all the points made apart from the sacking Kamran Akmal one. I think he's a good player overall and like every other player, has his ups and downs. Dosen't mean to say he should be sacked altogether.
    permalink
    Jammy February 5, 2010
    no kamran=sad umer.... really in t20 kamran is a real good opener
    permalink
    themens_123 February 6, 2010
    This is a fantastic blog However, heres a few things wrong:
    1. Keep Kamran Akmal, he is a great keeper and just because he had one bad performance doesn't mean that you don't stick by him.
    2. I don't think Salman Butt should be captain as he hasn't yet totally established himself in the world of cricket.

    But I agree with getting another T20 captain - Shahid Afridi, Putting T20 out the window and focusing on Tests and Getting a new captain.
    permalink
    Matty} February 6, 2010
    permalink
    lokre February 6, 2010
    afridl best captain
    permalink
    7862 February 6, 2010
    Good blog

    I agree with the feilding. Mohammed Yousuf once said "we don't need a feilding coach". I don't know who he was reffering to but I certainly think that it wasn;t Pakistan. Seriosuly, just ask someone like Rhodes to come over for a few months and teach em some stuff. The amount of catches dropped, run outs missed (wouldn't have that with Rhodes throwing himself at the stumps) is just not funny.

    I disagree with Kamran Akmal. Well, partially anyway. I agree, his batting isn't exactly what you'd call "international level" and dropping the same batsmen three times who makes a century to win the test isn't exactly cool with everyone, but give him one more chance. I've seen him whip the bails of faster than you can say "Sack Kamran", and he's got the support from his brother Umar to back him up.
    permalink
    Demolition 101 February 7, 2010
    Hi,this is M.Haris here frm pakistan.....so dark shadow! looks like u have done a lot of homework to write this blog! nice! i m sorry bt u dont know the ground realities! the fact is that pakistan has so much talent that if u choose players on merit it can defeat any side of the world,whosoever is saying that pakistan cant produce test batsmen then i would say to him that see asim kamal see yasir hameed see the players who scored 500 runs partnership in first class cricket(world record),u dont give chances to such great players and then u say pakistan dont have test players,i would agree wid dark shadow tht kamran akmal should be sacked....i would give 2 reasons for that,1.his wicket keeping is not up to the mark and 2.his attitude off the ground is extremely bad,he fought wid team members in dressing room,he talks rubbish about yousuf behind his back(this report was given in one of the leading news channel ov pakistan),dark shadow perhaps u dont know how much pakistani people hate salman butt,so plz dont think tht he will be the captain,as far as shahid afridi's ball tempering case is concerned,i wont defend his act,it was surely not a gud thing bt u have to praise him how he fought and how he made the team fight at the total of 213 against aussies,nd he immediately said sorry to the paki nation nd he said he wont repeat tht again,and i think he is the best choice for captain coz he pumps up the team spirit nd it looks like yes PAKISTAN is playing,his bowling choices r superb,he backs up the youngsters and he takes advice from other team members so for these reasons i think at present he is the best choice for pakistani cricket,the biggest think is that in our country players are not selected on merit if players r selected on merit then i can surely say no team can stand in our way,i can tell u a team for t20 and one dayers and test........so here it is:
    FOR T20:Imran Nazir,Imran Farhat,Shahid Afridi,Shoaib Malik,Umer Akmal,Fawad Alam,Abdul Razzaq,Mohammad Aamer,Sarfraz Ahmed,Mohammad Asif,Umar Gul
    FOR ONE DAYS:Imran Nazir,Shahid Afridi,Shoaib Malik,Umer Akmal,Umar Gul,Abdul Razzaq,Mohammad Aamer,Sarfraz Ahmed,Mohammad Asif,Yasir Mohammad Hafeez,Mohammad Yousuf
    FOR TESTS:Yasir Hameed,Umer Akmal,Mohamamd Yousuf,Asim Kamal,Younis Khan,Shoaib Malik,Sarfraz Ahmed,Mohammad Aamer,Mohammad Asif,Saeed Ajmal and Umar Gul
    permalink
    mharisabbasi08 February 7, 2010
    And yeah hasan matloob i agree wid most ov ur points.....shahid afridi should b captaining the side for t20s and one dayers but i think he can also play in test and he has already announced tht he is available for test he can play as a good bowler and he can b captain for all three formats of the game and i think this is the time u give him captaincy and let him b the captain till world cup nd i m sure he wont disappoint(perhaps there is nthng more to b disappointed after such a performance) and sorry if i have hurt any1's feelings.....
    permalink
    mharisabbasi08 February 7, 2010
    SHUT UP YOU ALL AFRIDI IS BEST CAPTAIN
    permalink
    bad b February 7, 2010
    Hey this is some thing I got from a website

    The rebel who could be king, and a rule whose time may be up
    Why Afridi may be the captain Pakistan needs, and why the case against ball-tampering may not be as strong as some of us think
    Harsha Bhogle
    February 5, 2010

    Comments: 76 | New! Login via | Text size: A | A

    Afridi: a rebel who should be given the chance to lead © Getty Images
    Related Links
    News : Afridi's actions unacceptable - Inzamam
    News : Afridi banned for two T20s for ball-tampering
    In Focus: Ball-tampering
    Players/Officials: Shahid Afridi
    Teams: Pakistan
    Shahid Afridi has always brought the essence of roulette to cricket. Not just the gambling variety but the rather more deadly Russian version. Predicting what Afridi is likely to do on a cricket field is like putting money on one of the 37 numbers on a roulette wheel and hoping you get it right. Off the field, though, he is more the oddball, likely to put the gun to his head and pull the trigger with one bullet in the clip. He has added greatly to the game but has self-destructed beyond imagination; a flash of genius one moment and a descent towards stupidity the next. Nobody else would do a pirouette on the pitch with spikes on. Hardly anyone would score a century off 45 balls opening the batting against a potent adversary. And certainly nobody would bite a dirty cricket ball and hope to camouflage the act by saying he was smelling it!

    I am not sure which was the more daft act: actually biting the ball (and testing his immunity!) or saying he did so to win his side a match (having realised that the "smelling the ball" approach was a touch flawed). It couldn't have got worse for Pakistan, with the trademark boardroom squabbles at full pitch, a pathetic performance on the field, and the hysteria over the IPL auction. Their real problems actually figure in that order; they'd be in reverse if you go by the time spent in debate over them.

    In spite of all this I believe Afridi might well be the right man to lead Pakistan in limited-overs cricket, for he is most likely to understand others like him. There is something about him that engages you, there is a little playfulness to him and he seems willing to take a gamble. He might just nudge the Pakistanis away from rebellion and towards victory. Some believe that he is at the heart of most rebellions - precisely the reason why he must be given a stint as a leader. In most parts of the world an offence as dramatic and disturbing as biting a ball to alter its condition would ensure you never became captain. But such is the diversity in our little sport that I suspect in another part of the world it may not even be remembered for too long.



    I believe Afridi might well be the right man to lead Pakistan in limited-overs cricket, for he is most likely to understand others like him. There is something about him that engages you, there is a little playfulness to him and he seems willing to take a gamble

    But at least one good has come out of it. We now have a nice debate on the whole issue of ball-tampering. Predictably bowlers, who have always played the role of the exploited, sometimes with good reason, are all in favour of fiddling a bit with the ball. Batsmen (and at least one wicketkeeper) are up in arms. The law doesn't allow it but maybe the time has come to question whether the law is indeed just. Cricket allows you to "maintain" the state of the ball but not to "alter" it. You can therefore rub the ball on your flannels to ensure the shine stays longer, but you cannot rub it on the ground, for example, to ensure it goes faster. But in either case you are altering the natural condition of the ball.

    By maintaining the shine a bowler prevents the ball from deterioration. And yet the worsening of the ball, and the ensuing implications, are at the very heart of our game. Either action seeks to make the two halves of the ball unequal, so why should one be allowed and the other outlawed? Is it because one helps conventional swing and the other encourages reverse swing, which has always been looked upon as the naughty child in the family? Or, let's face it, is it because batsmen don't like reverse swing?

    Having said that, I must admit I am not a fan of ball-tampering, but I do believe that if it went to a just court, those in favour would have a decent case.

    Angus Fraser, always interesting to read, equates it to a batsman who knows he is out but stands his ground. Like ball-tampering, not walking has traditionally been looked down upon; unlike ball-tampering, it is now accepted. So, here's a thought for everyone. Can you make walking mandatory? Put it in the laws of the game? And make standing your ground attract a fine? Would that make people walk all over again? What fun that would be.

    I don't know if Afridi would ever walk, but he certainly would find a hysterical reason for staying on!
    permalink
    Ahson Afzal 4 Weeks Ago
    I think Pakistan is making a mistake with Greg Chappell as the new prospective coach. India had a nightmare under his era and he is not exactly known for treating senior players with much respect. He is known to be a bossy sort of a character which will work really well with the junior sides (like u-19s and others), however with players like M. Yousuf (who consistently cries and complains about other players' attitude towards him), Younis Khan and Shahid Afridi, it will not be easy for Chappell to stamp his complete authority and he will soon find alot of rebellion in the Pakistani camp against him, something which we have got so use to. I think the only tables in which Pakistan cricket team is at the top right now with considerable distance is that of Conspiracy to Performance ratio.
    permalink
    hasan matloob 4 Weeks Ago
    muhammad yousaf is not a good captain afrdi is the best captain please take a new captain to get the trouble out and filded is not good.
    permalink
    muha8549 4 Weeks Ago
    iam very dissapointed with that performance of pakistan....
    permalink
    cricket lov 4 Weeks Ago
    you're right about kamran akmal
    permalink
    piplup46 4 Weeks Ago
 

Leave a comment