Go Back   Stick Sports Community > Blogs > The Bunyip's Blog
Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Rate this Entry

Ashes: Symonds misses out

The Bunyip May 20, 2009
Updated May 20, 2009 at 10:34 AM by The Bunyip

Roy Symonds has been left out of the 16-man Aussie squad for the Ashes, suggesting his career of 26 Test matches may be over.

Selectors instead opted to gamble on the fitness of Shane Watson, who is still recovering from a groin stain, and retain Ronald McDonald as, presumably, the backup all-rounder.

There weren't many other surprises in the squad. Nathan Hauritz, the sole centrally contracted spinner, is the only tweaker on the list - despite suggestions that Cardiff's pitch will warrant a dual-spin attack for the hosts.

The lack of a second spinner in the squad will increase Marcus North's stock price, especially if Australia is considering the prospect of not playing Hauritz in every Test. A veteran of two Tests, North has his eye on the crucial number six spot - and, obviously, on Shane Watson's groin... injury.

Doug Bollinger's sole Test in Sydney and performances in the one-day side weren't enough for selectors to include a second leftie frontline bowler. Either that or the marketing gurus deemed Brett Lee's blonde locks more promo-poster-friendly than Dougie's Advanced Hair mop.

The inclusion of Lee is a big show of faith in the speedster, who was on the verge of being dropped prior to his injury troubles. He hasn't played a first-class game of cricket since the Boxing Day Test, averages 45.44 in his ten Tests in England and yet he still managed a spot.

Ben Hilfenhaus' ability to swing the ball, even without the help of Murray Mints, was enough to book his plane ticket - though Lee's return may threaten his place in the side.

At this point Notch Johnson is the only certain starter in the Aussie bowling attack but it's hard to see selectors dumping the rapidly improving Peter Siddle. Then it will come down to the conditions and/or tour game form to decide whether Hilditch and co opt for Clark's seamers, Lee's speed or Hilfy's swing.

As expected, Graham Manou's inclusion on the central contracts list was a precursor to him being Haddin's understudy for this tour. Manou's rapid rise, overtaking the likes of Luke Ronchi and Chris Hartley to become the keeper-in-waiting, means he's just one strategically-placed ball on the Edgbaston outfield away from a Test debut.

Now that the touring party has been finalised, who is in your Ashes XI?


The Bunyip's XI: Phil Hughes, Simon Katich, Ricky Ponting (c), Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey, Marcus North, Brad Haddin, Mitch Johnson, Stuart Clark, Peter Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus. 12th Man: Andrew McDonald (he has to justify his plane ticket somehow, right?)

Full Aussie squad: Punter Ponting (c), Pup Clarke, Sarfraz Clark, Brad Haddin, Haurie Hauritz, Ben Hilfenhaus, Bradman Hughes, The Batsman Formerly Known As Mr Cricket Hussey, Notch Johnson, Simon Katich, Brett Lee, Graham Manou, Token Ranga, Marcus North, Peter Siddle, Shane Watson*.

*Likely to have been ruled out by the time you read this.
Posted in Cricket
Views 1607 Comments 16 Email Blog Entry

Total Comments: 16

Comments

    Good overview of the Ashes squad Bunyip. I don't think Symonds has done anything to merit a place in the squad, while McDonald was a steady while not dominant figure in the South African series.

    My Ashes XI:
    Simon Katich
    Phillip Hughes
    Ricky Ponting (c)
    Michael Hussey
    Michael Clarke
    Marcus North
    Brad Haddin
    Mitchell Johnson
    Peter Siddle
    Stuart Clark
    Ben Hilfenhaus/Brett Lee (will bat at 9 if he proves he is bowling back to his fastest in the tour matches)
    permalink
    kirby May 20, 2009

    Agree with you Bunyip, good selection for a QLD boy. Don't think Lee should make the cut.

    Phil Hughes, Simon Katich, Ricky Ponting (c), Michael Clarke, Michael Hussey, Marcus North, Brad Haddin, Mitchell Johnson, Stuart Clark, Peter Siddle, Ben Hilfenhaus. 12th Man: Andrew McDonald
    permalink
    cougar81 May 20, 2009

    Seriously what is everyone and saying 'Oh God Shane Watson is useless because he is always injured' ??? Ummmm hello he played like all of last year without injury- he played for queensland, IPL, the tours of West Indies and India...... and oh wow minor groin injury- the media just talks it up because of his bad injury history (and stress fractures...every fast bowler has the risk of getting them and usually do anyway) I think his injury woes are over..... he is obviously a very good player with both bat and ball- the series in Pakistan just now shows that- he had the best batting aggregate for the series(271 runs from 5 matches) and anyone underestimating his bowling should take a look at his bowling stats from the India tour last year- he was one of the best Australians in all bowling averages and was 2nd only to Mitchell Johnson on the Australian wicket taking list..... also just look at his performance in the IPL last year- he almost single handedly won the Rajastan Royals the title with both bat and ball..... he is a match winning all rounder!!!!!! (PS Freddy Flintoff another match winning fast bowling all rounder- has had his fair share of injuries too)
    Thank god Andrew Symonds was dropped- if a team needs specialist fielders we know who to turn to (I don't know why they dropped Shane Watson in the 1st place for Andrew Symonds..... picking on reputation is something the selectors should drop straight away- either that or they should be sacked)
    I like the top 5 in the test team now- Hughes, Katich, Ponting, Hussey and Clarke- they will get the job done when it comes to scoring runs..
    Haddin is the wicket-keeper- no doubts there comes in at No. 7
    Johnson would probably be picked before Ponting hes that good..
    Siddle is just the bowler that every captain wants- one that runs in and just bowls with pace and passion and intimidation- this will ensure vital wickets are secured at the end of the day.
    Now a 4th pace bowler...... Lee, Hilfenhaus or Clark? I reckon leave Lee out- he might have 300 or so wickets behind him- but he hasn't played in ages and he hasn't had success in England before so this just tips him out. Hilfenhaus may swing the ball but not enough or without enough variety to be successful. The pitches in England will suit Clark's seam bowling and since he's so much like Glen McGrath, who enjoyed great success in England- Clark should have a field day in England so is in my final XI.

    Spin- I suppose the selectors could just add Hilfenhaus in and have 5 pace bowlers but having the extra variety in your attack is always useful, and spin is very handy in English conditions. I suppose the only person I can pick is Nathan Hauritz, who is becoming better every time I see him play. If he can just add some more spin to the ball he will trouble the english batsmen no trouble at all.

    So my Ashes XI
    1. Hughes
    2. Katich
    3. Ponting(c)
    4. Hussey
    5. Clarke(vc)
    6. Watson
    7. Haddin
    8. Johnson
    9. Hauritz
    10.Siddle
    11.Clark
    12th man: North
    permalink
    10pick May 20, 2009

    The idea of not having Andrew Symonds in the Aussy team is pathetic.....i mean what sort of madness is this?.....this is something I expect from ENG....afterall we love to shoot outselves in the foot and Aussies love watching us do that......Andrew Symonds is a 100% geniune allrounder that is like a loaded gun for crying out loud!!!!!!.....he could destory ENG or anybody for that matter in 5-10 overs.....he could smash 50-70 easy.....he is that strong.....he is a good catcher and has a good arm, always useful for outfielding, and can direct hit with ease (opening the possibility of a sneaky run out....classic Aussy style).....lets not forget the variation of off spin and medium pace.....decent for buying a wicket or surprising the batsmen or part of a plan for sneaky tactics......the idea of not seeing him possibly destroy ENG is crazy.....what Scots McDonald to him? Andy has proved him potential in the real world, international cricket, and is the safer option of the two.....peter siddle is next to Johnson for my Aussy bowler of the year.......gives a new meaning to the phrase "bowl your heart out".....perfect fast bowler for kids to watch....quick, fast, aggressive, doesn't back down, run his a**e off all day long and won't stop till he gets his man.......thats the sign of a quality bowler if i ever knew it.....Johnson, for me, is favourite to be man of the series from both sides.....90mph + delieveries and with swing and seam will scare the s**t out of any batsmen....especially ENG batsmen who lets be fair don't have the bottle to do it when it really counts.....big tall lad and strong as a bloody bull.....the man is like a fighter jet!!!!!!....could easily help the Aussies with their long tail/unstable lower order issues that have occured since Gilly left.....and now with no andy that will again thin the batting.....watson is quality but even at his very best in this series....i can't see him doing what Fred did in 05.....fred is a much better bowler.......though i still think watson's bowling is quality.....hussey, Clarke and ponting are the backbone of the batting and thats a lot of pressure than before when you had the unsung hero of Martyn with Gilly, Langer, Hayders playing.....i think the batting of the Aussies is at its weakest in recent years........the seam bowling is rock solid.....I see no point in having Hauritz.....he is nothing....(have the selectors forgotten about the magical spin machine, impersonating the great Shane Warnes deliveries, that ENG batsmen practised on....to get better at playing spin?)....i much rather play the extra seamer or allrounder/bowler part time batsmen......
    permalink
    Harmyalltheway147 May 20, 2009

    I think....you may have a problem....with the concept and application....of full stops....
    permalink
    Mute May 20, 2009

    huges
    katich
    ponting
    Mike hussey
    michale clarke
    watson
    haddin
    mitch
    lee
    hilfy
    siddle

    Hughes is in recent form suggest he is the next big thing in international cricket . katich is in career best form no doubt. ponting needs to get in some form and then the poms are in trouble. pup well hes the man hes in form scoring runs thats what you need . mike hussey well get in some form and learn how to score runs again or brade hodge should walk into the team. symonds well he didnt get piked . i fell he didnt because of his shield form more than anything which is more than fair for me . you cannot not perform in state cricket and expect to get piked for test . haddin well a good batsman but needs to focus on why hes really there . TO KEEP he is one of the worst keeprs ive seen play 4 australia and manou wont have to wait long for a debut i do not think . well mitch hes in no buts , hilfy swings it nips it around and is quick perfest for england . lee well hes bowling fast swings the ball and is now a thinking bowler in the team also. siddle fast hard working superb bowler and thorughly deserves his spot.well for me there is no need for spin , mike clarke and katich can take care of that .and NO.6 who will bat there ? well watson will bowls quick and can bat and adds real balance to the team . this series will make or break the australian team so good luck and australia 3 - 1 will win the series


    any opinions ??????
    permalink
    steve athoo May 21, 2009

    thats bad because he still has a lot to offer
    permalink
    Gone May 21, 2009

    i reckon the australian ashes side should be this
    Phil Hughes
    Simon Katich
    Ricky Ponting
    Michael Clarke
    Mike Hussey
    Mitchell Johnson
    Brad Haddin
    Brett Lee
    Nathan Haurits
    Peter Siddle
    Stuart Clark
    Shane Watson 12th man
    permalink
    haysie99 May 24, 2009

    No sure Mitchell Johnson has scored plenty of runs in the last few tests but he cannot be put in the all-rounders spot at No. 6- sure he can handle the bat but that leaves a gapping hole in the batting line-up if selected there- he really is a hit or miss "oh its his day" kinda player- not someone you want in your top 6- no.8 is the best spot for him for the time being. Shane Watson is the perfect candidate at no.6 as he can bowl over 140km/h accurately like Mitch and is a very good batsman- hes proved himself as an opener(probably one of the hardest places to bat) at international level and is more than capable.
    permalink
    10pick May 24, 2009

    10pick if u think about wouldnt our bowling side be better if we had stuart clark peter siddle brett lee nathan haurits mitchell johnson as our bowling attack it would be the best ever
    permalink
    haysie99 May 27, 2009

    why is everyone talking up shane watson when he no longer bowls
    therefore making him a batsman and a batsman should not be playing in an all rounders spot and i agree that andrew symonds test days are over so i reckon that the ashes Xi should be

    Hughes
    Katich
    Ponting
    Clarke
    Hussey
    Hadden
    McDonald
    Johnson
    Hauritz
    Siddle
    Clark
    12th man North
    permalink
    May 28, 2009 at 05:09 AM

    yeah haysie99 i agree that would be a pretty good bowling attack but im just not convinced that Mitchell Johnson is top 6 standard yet- im looking for balance in the side and to acheive that I think we have to sacrifice one of the other pacemen.... just my opinion..
    As for narrabrikid... we are talking up Shane Watson as he is a high quality all-rounder(YES ALL-ROUNDER IS WHAT I SAID- he does bowl- there was a article on it in just the last couple of days about he was back in the nets) and the only one in the squad useful to Ricky Ponting- he scores centuries and takes wickets- what you want from your all-rounder(and hes about the only quality one in Australia at the moment- apart from Ashley Noffke, Marcus North and James Hopes) why do you think Ricky Ponting and that were talking about he brings great balance to the side when he was selected in the squad? Because they want him in the team...
    All im going to say is Andrew McDonald is a joke- my sister can bowl faster then him and probably better at batting.. haha
    permalink
    10pick May 28, 2009

    well if shane watson is a high quality all rounder then how come in the pakistan tour he did not bowl? and saying cause he opened the batting is a lame excuse cause chris gayle opens the batting 4 west indies yet still bowls on a very regular basis therefore australia now see him as a batsman and not an allrounder and since we have enough batsman in the test side that would more or less make watson useless to the test squad and also if u think McDonald is so crap then i'd like 2 see you prove that your sister is better then him at cricket good luck with that haha
    permalink
    May 28, 2009 at 11:22 PM

    1st thing: read these sentences very carefully(they were in my last post)
    1."why do you think Ricky Ponting and that were talking about he brings great balance to the side when he was selected in the squad?"
    2."there was a article on it in just the last couple of days about he was back in the nets"

    2nd thing: He didn't bowl in Pakistan since he was just finishing up his rehabilitation from his surgery for the stress fractures in his back. He can still bat because this doesn't affect these fractures in his back.

    3rd thing: He WAS going to bowl in Pakistan in the Twenty20 before his minor groin strain- I don't know why he didn't bowl with it..... the pussy Australian officials thought that any injury to their STAR ALL-ROUNDER would cost them the Ashes and made sure he didn't bowl as a precautionary measure. Hell even Brad Haddin played in the West Indies with a broken finger- but there were no other good test wicket keepers at the time and we need the best side fielded for test matches. Shane Watson not bowling in a unimportant Twenty20 match to ensure his fitness seems like a pretty good reason I think.
    4th thing: How on earth is opening the batting got to do with him not bowling- i know many openers(actually most) that don't bowl and are picked because of their batting- Watson was obviously good enough without his bowling to be picked there. But Watson is an all-rounder and Australia still views him that way.
    permalink
    10pick May 29, 2009

    ok fine he may be seen by officials and by u as an allrounder but from my opinion shane watson should be an odi allrounder and not a test allrounder i see Mcdonald as a more suited test allrounder because watson has got the talent 4 odi but don't have the fitness for test and Mcdonald has already shown consistantcy in test already scoring a half centuary and having a few wickets under his name therefore Mcdonald should play in test and Watson should play in odi
    permalink
    May 31, 2009 at 12:17 AM

    i just hope its a competitive and exciting series. judging my recent english form, and to some small extent australia's, i really fear all the hype will be for nothing. but these sides usually bring out the best in each other and im sure the standard will be great. im not sure about watson as a test player either, i think he should get a chance though.
    permalink
    nihlist June 17, 2009

 

Leave a comment

Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks