Go Back   Stick Sports Community > Blogs > Pad First
Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Rate this Entry

5 Reasons Why Steve Smith Will Debut Against New Zealand

kirby March 16, 2010

When the Australian Test squad for the tour of New Zealand was announced last week, one reasonably surprising inclusion was 20-year-old New South Wales leggie Steve Smith. On first glance, it may seem his inclusion is only ceremonial, but I believe that he will play in the first Test against New Zealand starting on Friday, and these are the five reasons why.

1. The Kid's In Form
Smith was recently named the Steve Waugh medallist for the 2009/10 season (NSW player of the year), unsurprising due to the rich vein of form he's struck this season. In this year's Sheffield Shield competition, he's hit 772 runs at 77.2 and snared 21 wickets at the slightly unflattering average of 44.38. But it's his most recent performances that have been fantastic: scoring hundreds in his last two Shield games, and adding a career best 7/64 to the most recent match against South Australia. His leggies are by far the biggest factor for his selection, and if he hadn't taken 7 wickets in his last outing we wouldn't be having this discussion. But he did, and we are.

2. Warnie Done Good
Perhaps Smith's biggest influence has been the greatest spinner of all time, Shane Warne. Since Smith was called in as emergency cover for fellow tweaker Nathan Hauritz in the leadup to last year's Boxing Day Test, Warne has taken Smith under his wing and halved his bowling average. There could be nothing better as a young spinner when you find one of the most influential cricketing personalities in the world sitting in your corner; not only has Warne sorted out some slight technical issues for Smith, but his support has seen Smith's self-confidence skyrocket since the New Year.

3. The Selectors Want Two Spinners
When quizzed about Smith's inclusion in the Test squad, Chairman of Selectors Andrew Hilditch answered that Smith's batting is secondary to the luxury he will afford Ricky Ponting if picked: the Australians will be playing two genuine spinners. There was no "He's just along for the ride" answer (a la Jon Holland on last year's one-day tour of India), which is a very strong indicator of the selectors willing to put faith in one of Australian cricket's most exciting prospects.

Ricky Ponting, too, has defended the decision to not include Smith in the one-day squad for the recently concluded Chappell-Hadlee series, saying "That's half the reason we didn't actually add him to the one-day squad... It was for him to get a bit more experience at first-class level back home and hoping he'd do what he has done. He has done everything right to give himself the best chance of playing". Reading between the lines, these comments by the Chairman of Selectors and the Australian captain are pointing to Smith getting his Baggy Green on Friday.

4. The Kiwis Can't Play Leg-spin
Warnie can attest to this, and that was during the era when the Black Caps had a strong batting lineup (Fleming, Astle, etc.). To put it simply, leg-spin is one art that most Test teams have trouble with, and the current Kiwi side is no exception (see Danish Kaneria's performance on green wickets in the New Zealander's most recent series).

The Kiwi selectors seem to have placed a large bet against their team for the upcoming first Test, further weakening an already fragile batting order, with skipper Dan Vettori to bat at 6. Vettori's promotion is aimed to give the Kiwis every chance of taking 20 wickets by playing an extra bowler, but seems to be at the expense of batting strength. What better way to get Smith into the fold than to give him a debut in a situation where his ego is not likely to be permanently dented.

5. He's Got Time On His Side
There can be no better feeling as a selector than when you give a youngster his first Test and subsequently see him rise to the occasion. Smith could be such a youngster, and seeing him develop into a top-class player while playing for the Australian side will undoubtedly be a major drawcard for the selectors at a time when they are looking towards the younger portion of the Australian domestic scene for future players. And by getting him into the Test fold as soon as possibly could reduce the likelihood of him running off and joining the circus (IPL).
Posted in Cricket
Views 1910 Comments 20 Email Blog Entry
« More Pakistani Problems     Main     Merv, 2.0 »

Total Comments: 20

Comments

    Couldn't agree more with your points. Tim McIntosh is generally a good player of spin. Ross Taylor just doesn't think spinners are allowed to bowl, so he plays them pretty capably. All the others are no-hopers. Bowling Hauritz and Smith at the Basin may be an opportunity cost for a seamer, but Hamilton generally has a bit in it for the spinners. Looking forward to seeing how he goes. I rate him as a better batsman from what I've seen of him in Shield cricket, and I'll emphasise that there'll never be another Warnie. But if you truly believe this kid has the goods, it's worth persisting with him.
    permalink
    aidancdaman March 16, 2010

    The trouble is, he's not even as good a bowler as Cameron White, who would be a much better inclusion.
    permalink
    Coyote March 16, 2010

    Cameron wHITE AND SMITH FTW
    permalink
    nanny2 March 16, 2010

    Yeah, no, I'll pass on that.
    permalink
    Glinn Mgraw March 16, 2010

    I never said I want him to, I just said he will. I'd still much rather see Cameron White in the side.

    But the selectors will pick Smith.
    permalink
    kirby March 16, 2010

    Dave Warner the otter

    permalink
    vivtheindian March 16, 2010

    White cant hack it at test level when picked as a bowler. The tour of India and his attitude to it was ample display of his thoughts towards his bowling. His batting may be OK in ODI's but he has done little to excite when asked to be a bowler. As much as I am a fan of Marcus North, his recent returns are doing him no favours and Smith would be a sensible choice.
    permalink
    Godbothera March 17, 2010

    White's bowling has been up the shit since he played those Tests in india.
    permalink
    Wogsrus March 17, 2010

    Originally Posted by kirby
    I never said I want him to, I just said he will. I'd still much rather see Cameron White in the side.

    But the selectors will pick Smith.
    They will not pick him for the first test.

    If North gets a pair, Hughes is just as likely to come in for the second.
    permalink
    Glinn Mgraw March 17, 2010

    Why can't more blogs be like this?

    Great one Kirby.
    permalink
    Demolition 101 March 17, 2010

    i dont really like him as a bowler, that might be because everyone is trying to compare him to warne, but there is no doubt that the kid can bat, get rid of north, push haddin to 6 and slot smithy at 7...
    permalink
    nick hendo March 17, 2010

    Great Blog as always Kirby
    permalink
    Matty} March 19, 2010

    i prefer marcus north as he adds quite a bit of death to the batting order something they cannot afford to lose when playing against the top test teams. I also belive there would be several better selections than smith such as andrew mcdonald,james hopes, cameron white and moisus hienriques
    permalink
    benfish26 March 20, 2010

    I would definately prefer NORTH over SMITH.AUSSIES have enough firepower in their bowling lineup and NORTH has done remarkbly well in the past.there is no reason to drop him.WHITE might be a good option but he needs to improve his bowling.All in all a good blog.
    permalink
    akhourias March 20, 2010

    North 112*
    permalink
    CamGasp March 20, 2010

    i think that steve smith is great talent and good all round cricketer, but cameron white is also a versatile batsmen. I wouldn't want to be a selector. The thing is the aussies dont need anything more, noone can bloody beat them anyway.
    permalink
    Umar360 March 20, 2010

    Smith won't bat or bowl as good as he does at shield level at internetional level, give the kid time to develop, don't judge him on one good test or season
    permalink
    elthornto March 21, 2010

    Exactly they have done the same thing with phillip hughes now the weight of expectation that he is the " future of Australian cricket" has made evan good performances seem dissapointing as he is been judged on the tour of south africa. Picking Steve Smith prematurly would risk falling into the same trap which would be silly considering the team is in no desperate need of a change as it is been successful as is and so is Steve Smith.
    permalink
    benfish26 March 21, 2010

    WWWWWWWWWWWWhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iitttttttttttttttttttteeeeeeeeeeeeeee ssssssssssssssssssahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhooooo ooooooooooooooooooooooouuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuul lllllllllllllllllllllllldddddddddddddddddddddddd bbbbbbbbbbbbbbeeeeeeeeeeee nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeexxxxxxxxxxxxxx tttttttttt not Steve Smith(even though im a newsouthwelshman)but yeah he also has leadership qualities and iz caaaaappppppppttttaaaaaiinnn of an UNNBHEEATTAAABLEE VVVIICCCTTTOOOOORIIIIIAA SSSSIIIIIIDDDDDDEEEEEEE aaaaat tttthhhheeee mmooomeeenttt
    permalink
    BENJIHOP March 21, 2010

    Benjihop. ur a spaz.
    permalink
    aza_man March 21, 2010

 

Leave a comment

Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks