Go Back   Stick Sports Community > Blogs > Against the Spin
Blogs Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Rate this Entry

Cautious Batsmen, Nervous Bowlers

againstthespin July 19, 2009
Updated July 20, 2009 at 12:09 AM by Mute

Commentators often talk about players planning out an over. A batsmen may want to see off the first couple deliveries, and a bowler may try to keep it tight off the last ball of the over. It is interesting to look at the actual data behind those strategies. Using ball-by-ball data from the Against the Spin data repository, we can look at run-scoring and wicket-taking across the six deliveries of each over.

There is some evidence that batsmen may score less of the first ball of the over, possibly trying to be cautious against the new bowler. For their part, bowlers take some time to settle down, conceding a significantly higher number of wides & no balls of the first delivery of the over. Batsman are also more likely to take a single of the last ball of an over, presumably in an attempt to keep the strike.

Batsmen are less likely to hit the first ball of a bowler’s over for a boundary than they are to hit subsequent balls to the fence.



The third ball of an over has a higher likelihood of taking a wicket, though this may just be a statistical fluke.



This graph is perhaps the most interesting. The average runs conceded in no balls & wides (these are the extras where the bowler is at fault) is significantly higher off the first ball of an over, compared to the middle of the over. This suggests that bowlers may be a little tight at the beginning of an over, resulting in overstepping, or a wild delivery.

Posted in Cricket
Views 1835 Comments 12 Email Blog Entry

Total Comments: 12

Comments

    Hmm, good blog, but I've got to say that stats count for nothing. It is solely up to the individual on when they bowl their bad balls, and you can't really take those stats into a game situation because some of the fours taken into that data may be from edges, or missfields. The batsman may not have put away a bad ball, or there may have been a great stop in the field.
    permalink
    Blink July 19, 2009

    Oh, I completely agree with you, Blink. When it comes to an individual over, or a single ball, these stats are nearly meaningless. In the short-term, there's a huge role for chance, as well as skill.

    But over the long run, you do see some interesting patterns. For example, it's impossible to judge exactly how many runs a team would've scored if it didn't rain, and hence an individual rain-shortened match might have an unfair result. But if you look at hundreds of matches, Duckworth-Lewis will be "right" more often than not.

    So while I agree with you that stats like these aren't really relevant to what's going to happen on the next ball, they do offer some interesting insights on the game.
    permalink
    againstthespin July 19, 2009

    Yeh who doesn't love a good bar graph. Interesting reading but essentially meaningless.
    permalink
    Fisha July 20, 2009

    good blog. hmmmmmmmmmmm i don't quite understand what your getting at here but this is what i think if you look at the first bar graph the 2nd ball is more likely a boundary than the others and then when you look at the graph for the wickets you'll see that it's the 3rd ball so after the batter has hit a boundary he's likely to get out on the next ball according to your evidence.
    permalink
    johnoson July 20, 2009

    in the 3 bar graphs, the probability of a boundry being hit in an over is quite high and its the same for a wicket being taken in an over. but extras in an over is quite low so it shows that maybe a batsman has played a good shot, maybe a cover dirve or something like that and then they get carried away and get out.
    permalink
    cricketmania246 July 20, 2009

    i think that 1 person could account for most of the extras in the first ball Amjad Khan i am not quite sure but against the windies wasnt it 17 no-balls and 20 byes just off him
    permalink
    broady2009 July 20, 2009

    yea you are right
    permalink
    safraz7 July 21, 2009

    this is for the guys of stick cricket that put bowling option and batting and for sure the toss then it would be a good website plus put the no ball wide it should just look like the 3D super brain flying website i just want this much for you all guys to do

    thank you...........Jay nachiket
    permalink
    Jay nachiket July 21, 2009
    Updated July 21, 2009 at 09:34 AM by Jay nachiket (forgot something)

    "Batsmen are less likely to hit the first ball of a bowler’s over for a boundary than they are to hit subsequent balls to the fence."

    not if youre gilly
    permalink
    yayy100 July 21, 2009

    Or Fisha.
    permalink
    Blink July 25, 2009

    Or Sehwag
    permalink
    10dulkar July 26, 2009

    but u've got 2 fink if it's a good batter or rubbish / a good bowler or rubbish
    permalink
    issy4lyf1999 July 28, 2009

 

Leave a comment

Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks